Karnataka, India’s tech hub home to Bengaluru, has become the first state in the country to ban social media use by minors under 16 years of age. This move follows global calls for more scrutiny over children’s digital engagement amid growing concerns about their exposure to unrestricted internet access and addiction.
Banning will take effect without a specific timeline outlined, as Chief Minister Siddaramaiah delivered his annual budget speech on Friday. This decision comes in response to mounting fears about the adverse effects of increasing mobile usage on young minds.
India is the second-largest smartphone market globally with 750 million devices and over one billion internet users. As the world’s largest social media market, Karnataka faces these concerns within its own borders. A recent survey by India’s federal health ministry found that less than one-quarter of Karnataka’s population is under the age of 15, highlighting the demographic impact this ban will have.
Bengaluru, often referred to as India’s Silicon Valley, houses global tech giants including Microsoft, Amazon, IBM, Dell, and Google. The state has seen significant growth in technology sectors over recent years.
While Karnataka’s move may be leading edge among Indian states, Goa is also considering a similar ban. In January, an Andhra Pradesh lawmaker proposed a bill to curb social media usage for children. This development coincides with remarks from India’s chief economic adviser, who called for drafting age-based access policies to tackle what he termed as “digital addiction.”
Some stakeholders have expressed reservations about the effectiveness of these bans, noting that minors can still evade restrictions by using fake IDs. Consequently, they advocate for developing healthier social media usage guidelines and support for parents in navigating this issue.
India’s diverse socio-economic landscape suggests that more states will likely follow suit, with New Delhi urging for comprehensive policies to address digital addiction among youth. The move underscores the growing national debate on balancing internet freedom with public welfare concerns within the world’s largest democracy.